What is one criterion for evaluating alternatives generated during team problem solving?

Evaluating alternatives generated during team problem solving involves assessing various aspects to ensure that solutions are viable and align with ethical standards. Legal and human rights considerations stand out as a critical criterion because any proposed solution must not violate laws or infringe upon individual rights. This aspect ensures that the outcomes of the problem-solving process adhere to regulatory requirements and respect the dignity, rights, and freedoms of individuals involved.

While factors like efficiency of the proposed solution, popularity among team members, and cost effectiveness of implementation are important, they do not inherently guarantee that a solution is just or equitable. In contrast, focusing on legal and human rights considerations provides a foundational safeguard that the proposed alternatives will be ethical and socially responsible, ultimately leading to choices that are sustainable and acceptable within societal frameworks.